Distant Date Commitments
Fixed scope committed to months in advance causes pressure to cut corners as deadlines approach, making quality flex instead of scope.
less than a minute
Anti-patterns related to how work is estimated, scheduled, and how the organization thinks about the feasibility of continuous delivery.
| Anti-pattern | Category | Quality impact |
|---|
Fixed scope committed to months in advance causes pressure to cut corners as deadlines approach, making quality flex instead of scope.
Story points are used as a management KPI for team output, incentivizing point inflation and maximizing velocity instead of delivering value.
Hours are spent estimating work that changes as soon as development starts, creating false precision for inherently uncertain work.
Story points or velocity are used to evaluate individual performance. Developers game the metrics instead of delivering value.
Arbitrary deadlines override quality, scope, and sustainability. Everything is priority one. The team cuts corners to hit dates and accumulates debt that slows future delivery.
The belief that CD works for others but not here - “we’re regulated,” “we’re too big,” “our technology is too old” - is used to justify not starting.
CD adoption is deferred until a mythical rewrite that may never happen, while the existing system continues to be painful to deploy.